The Decline of Secular Certainties

The challenges that Russell and Wittgenstein tackled were part of a broader paradigm shift. By the late 19th century, many scholars began to scrutinize long-standing beliefs from ancient Greece, including Aristotle’s logic, Euclidean geometry, and the miasma theory in medicine, overturning centuries of accepted thought.

The magnitude of this shift cannot be overstated. Aristotle's syllogistic reasoning, Euclid’s assertion that parallel lines never meet, and Hippocrates’ belief that illness was caused by foul air were foundational to Western philosophy.

As knowledge advanced, however, flaws in these concepts became apparent. Paradoxes emerged that questioned Aristotle’s logic, while mathematicians such as Gauss, Lobachevsky, Bolyai, and Riemann introduced the concept of curved spaces where parallel lines could intersect. Additionally, scientists like Robert Koch, Joseph Lister, and Louis Pasteur formulated the germ theory of disease.

These developments were remarkably beneficial. The advent of non-Euclidean geometry facilitated Einstein's general theory of relativity, and germ theory led to antibiotics and increased life expectancy. Yet, these breakthroughs fostered an excessive optimism about human cognitive capabilities.

A New Era of Scientific Belief

In the early 20th century, science and technology began to assert themselves as powerful forces in Western society. Innovations in electricity, automobiles, and telecommunications drastically altered daily life, with physicists like Einstein and Bohr becoming household names. It appeared that scientific rigor could conquer any challenge.

Amid this backdrop, Moritz Schlick established the Vienna Circle, which became a hub for the logical positivist movement throughout the 1920s and 1930s. Central to this movement was Wittgenstein’s theory of atomic facts, positing that the world could be distilled into verifiable statements devoid of opinion or speculation. These statements would be governed by logical algorithms that determined the validity of arguments.

However, even as this logical framework expanded, the foundational crisis in logic persisted. To address this dilemma, the eminent mathematician David Hilbert proposed a three-pronged approach. First, mathematics must be demonstrably complete, applicable to all statements. Second, it must be consistent, free from contradictions. Finally, all statements should be computable, yielding definitive answers.

Then, an unexpected twist occurred. A young logician named Kurt Gödel proved that every logical system contains inherent contradictions. Alan Turing demonstrated that not all numbers are computable. The debates between Einstein and Bohr concluded in favor of Bohr, dismantling Einstein’s vision of an objective physical reality and presenting a universe rife with uncertainty.

The Emergence of Pseudo-Scientists

The conclusion was clear: facts could never be absolutely verified but could be accepted until disproven. Through rigorous testing, we could enhance our confidence, but absolute certainty remained elusive. Ironically, the decline of rigid logic paved the way for the digital computing era and a new technological landscape. As we recognized the fallibility of systems, the machines we created became astonishingly powerful.

Simultaneously, the role of human decision-making faced increasing skepticism. Subjective judgments had contributed to economic crises and the immense conflicts of the 20th century. As the Baby Boomer generation matured in the 1960s, it seemed that nothing was beyond debate. The inherent uncertainty of human judgment began to appear impractical.

Much like Wittgenstein and the Vienna Circle, several thinkers aimed to engineer systems that would harness natural forces for improved outcomes. The Austrian School of economics rejected government intervention in favor of consumer-driven choices, while neorealism in international relations posited that competition and conflict could regulate global affairs.

Yet, unlike the initial logical positivists, these concepts transcended academia, permeating the lives of everyday individuals. The consumer welfare standard argued that market price signals, rather than bureaucratic oversight, should dictate transaction permissions. Meanwhile, the principle of shareholder value insisted that market dynamics, rather than corporate managers, should steer business decisions.

The consequences are evident. Insufficient antitrust measures have intensified concentration across most American industries, stifling competition, diminishing business dynamism, and lowering productivity. Our economic landscape has become less productive, less competitive, and less vibrant, resulting in stagnant purchasing power for many. By nearly every measure, we find ourselves worse off.

Nurturing Ecosystems Rather Than Machines

We often perceive ourselves as rational beings, meticulously evaluating evidence prior to decision-making. However, our cognitive processes do not operate that way. We form our perspectives through neural connections and social networks, which create intricate webs of influence. Once we adopt a viewpoint, we seldom adjust it based on new information.

Engineers operate under the premise of defined laws that can be practically applied, designing machines for specific functions. In contrast, gardeners embrace complexity and emergence; they nurture their gardens rather than impose rigid designs, adapting their methods as circumstances change.

It is imperative that we adopt a gardener’s mindset over an engineer’s. For many significant endeavors, we are managing ecosystems rather than machines. We should focus on networks that evolve rather than fixed nodes whose behaviors we can anticipate and control. Our success hinges not on individual components but on the interconnections among them.

In a world dominated by networks and ecosystems, we can no longer approach strategy as if it were a chess game, meticulously planning each move with exact precision. Leadership now involves making decisions with the understanding that many will be incorrect, necessitating adjustments along the way.

There is no external system to guide us, nor any impersonal forces directing our path. Ultimately, we must place our trust in ourselves; there is no alternative.

Greg Satell is a transformation and change expert, international keynote speaker, and bestselling author of Cascades: How to Create a Movement that Drives Transformational Change. His previous work, Mapping Innovation, was recognized as one of the best business books of 2017. Discover more about Greg on his website, GregSatell.com, and follow him on Twitter @DigitalTonto.

Interested in this article? Sign up for weekly insights from Greg!