Understanding Children and COVID-19: Five Key Theories Explained
Written on
The Mystery of Children's Immunity
Since the onset of the pandemic, one of the most puzzling questions has been the response of children to the novel coronavirus. Notably, youngsters, especially those under ten, do not seem as susceptible to the virus compared to adults. This observation is perplexing, given that children are generally more prone to respiratory infections. "In my field, almost everything infects kids more than it does adults," notes Dr. Alfin Vicencio, a pediatric pulmonologist at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai. "This is an unusual situation."
Early research from Europe and Asia sparked optimism, indicating that children might be nearly immune to the virus. For instance, in Iceland, none of the 848 randomly selected children under ten tested positive for COVID-19, and those tested due to suspected exposure had a positivity rate half that of adults. A study from China echoed these findings, showing only 1% of COVID-19 cases were among children under ten and another 1% among those aged 10 to 19. Recent statistical models suggest that children are about half as likely to contract the virus as adults.
"Kids aren't superheroes; they're not shielded by any magical barrier. However, suggesting they are equally infectious as adults, especially when they are less likely to show symptoms, also seems misguided," Vicencio states.
In the United States, encouraging reports in June indicated virtually no cases in YMCA day camps and daycare centers that remained operational, despite caring for 40,000 children. However, by July, the situation shifted dramatically, with a fivefold rise in cases among children under ten in Oregon, outbreaks in Texas daycare facilities, and alarming statistics from Florida indicating that one-third of tested children were positive. A notable outbreak at a camp in Georgia involved 232 children—45% of attendees—aged six to seventeen, with 26% of cases being asymptomatic. This raises questions about the true level of immunity among children.
"The conversation has swung between two extremes," comments Dr. Emily Oster, an economics professor at Brown University who has been monitoring COVID-19 cases in camps and daycare settings. "[Some] people claim, 'You can't catch it from kids.' That's obviously incorrect and shows a fundamental misunderstanding of how viruses work. Kids are not superheroes; they're not encased in a protective shell. But asserting they spread the virus just as much as adults, despite being less symptomatic, also seems off."
The core question remains: why are children seemingly less vulnerable? Is there a biological basis for their lower infection rates, or do behavioral differences lead to reduced exposure?
Theories on Children's Immunity
Biological Barriers: ACE2 Receptors
One theory gaining traction suggests that children have fewer ACE2 receptors, which the coronavirus uses to invade cells. These receptors are concentrated in the airways, and a study published in the Journal of the American Medical Association indicated that children possess significantly fewer ACE2 receptors in their noses compared to adults. Dr. Vicencio, who participated in the study, explains, "Younger kids have fewer receptors, which could mean less viral entry."
Dr. George Rutherford, an epidemiology professor at UC San Francisco, supports this, saying it offers a tangible explanation for children's lower infection rates. However, a recent Swiss study found that children who test positive have similar viral loads as adults, implying they might be just as contagious.
Immunity from Common Colds
Another theory posits that children may enjoy partial immunity due to prior exposure to other coronaviruses responsible for common colds. Research indicates that around 50% of adults have immune cells that respond to the novel coronavirus, even without prior infection. This raises the possibility that prior infections might enable a quicker immune response against the new virus.
Dr. Alba Grifoni, a researcher at the La Jolla Institute, notes, "If this hypothesis holds true, it could explain the prevalence of mild and asymptomatic cases among children." However, Dr. Audrey Odom John from the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia expresses skepticism, stating that simply having prior exposure does not guarantee immunity.
Dr. John suggests an alternative perspective: perhaps children respond typically to the virus, while adults with severe symptoms are reacting abnormally due to previous infections.
Age-Related Risk Factors
Another consideration is that children's immune systems differ significantly from adults'. As children grow older, they begin to respond more like adults, especially during puberty. In countries where schools have reopened, high schools have seen outbreaks, while elementary schools have reported relatively few cases.
"Older children are more prone to infection because they resemble adults physiologically," observes Dr. Thomas Murray, a pediatric infectious disease specialist at Yale University.
Behavioral Isolation
Without a clear biological explanation, some researchers speculate that social behaviors might account for lower infection rates. The closure of schools reduced children's exposure to the virus. With limited movement, young children may not have encountered the virus as frequently as adults, especially during lockdown periods.
A study from Switzerland found that children aged five to nine and adults over 65 had lower antibody rates than adults aged 20 to 49, likely due to differences in behavior that minimized exposure.
Testing Disparities
Lastly, it's plausible that children may have similar infection rates as adults but are less frequently tested due to being more often asymptomatic. A study in China indicated that children could contract the virus at comparable rates to adults, but they often remain asymptomatic, leading to underreporting.
Dr. John mentions, "It's evident there are numerous asymptomatic cases among children, and larger studies may underrepresent them without comprehensive testing."
In conclusion, while the dialogue surrounding children's susceptibility to COVID-19 continues, experts agree on effective prevention measures: masks, physical distancing, ventilation, and hand hygiene. The guidelines from organizations like the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommend that these strategies be applied to both children and adults as schools consider reopening. Dr. John emphasizes that preventing transmission in schools, much like in hospitals, hinges on the same rigorous measures, which require significant resources and commitment.