Unveiling the Illusion of Self: The Mind and Its Symbols
Written on
Chapter 1: The Geode Analogy and the Mind
The comparison of a geode to the mind-brain relationship is quite fascinating. Externally, a geode resembles an unremarkable volcanic rock, yet when opened, it reveals a stunning interior filled with crystals.
In a similar vein, the brain appears to be just a mass of neural tissue, but this external view belies its dual nature. While it may seem like a mere object, its true essence is found within the mind, a vibrant subject of experience. The intricate qualitative aspects of our mental states, referred to as "qualia," remain concealed from an outside observer. Often, those unfamiliar with our inner workings may overlook the significance of what we inherently understand.
An illustrative historical example comes from the ancient Egyptians, who removed the brain during mummification, unaware of its critical role in supporting consciousness. Similarly, we might overlook the geode's hidden beauty simply because it’s not visible at first glance.
This duality of perception extends to social contexts as well. Whether in games, sports, or the arts, the rules governing these activities are often seen as arbitrary stipulations. From the viewpoint of an enthusiast, chess or football can seem crucial, with their regulations appearing almost sacred. Yet, to someone unacquainted with these pursuits, they may appear nonsensical.
Now, let’s delve deeper into one aspect of our internal experience: the significance of symbols. Philosophers refer to this as "intentionality," or the notion that our thoughts and statements point to things in the world. Is this perceived meaning simply a byproduct of our inner perspective, or does it hold an objective essence? Are the meanings of symbols mere constructs, or are they rooted in the fundamental nature of reality?
When we engage with a language, the meanings leap from the page. Even during meditation, where one strives to silence thoughts, the inner voice persists. For instance, a native English speaker cannot help but recognize the meaning behind the word "dog."
However, from an objective perspective, these meanings seem to dissipate, much like the moral values attached to our actions. As noted by David Hume, our senses cannot detect the inherent wrongness in actions like murder. The concept of "badness" lacks a tangible form, just as the letters that compose "dog" are merely shapes devoid of significance when viewed dispassionately.
Yet, when we crack open the geode, we unveil those enchanting crystals.
This paragraph will result in an indented block of text, typically used for quoting other text.
Section 1.1: Reconciling Internal and External Perspectives
To bridge the gap between these contrasting viewpoints, we tend to accept that what feels real from our inner perspective is indeed valid. The mental and social constructs we perceive emerge from the intricate layers of nature, akin to the hidden crystals within a geode. Just because someone outside the experience cannot grasp the intricacies does not render subjectivity meaningless.
Nevertheless, the inner perspective may be more of an illusion than a tangible reality. We engage with our minds and society based on conventions that breathe life into these phenomena. To possess a mind is to think in culturally familiar terms, while participating in a game requires a suspension of disbelief and adherence to its rules. Once these rules are acknowledged, the activity becomes an autonomous experience.
However, the crystals within the geode, while captivating, are not magical. Similarly, the meanings we ascribe to symbols might not be as essential as we presume for functioning effectively in society.
Subsection 1.1.1: The Dual Nature of Internal Perspectives
Two distinct internal perspectives exist: the conventional and the subversive. The latter seeks a philosophical synthesis that reconciles our inner feelings with external realities. This broader, skeptical viewpoint acknowledges the objective nature of minds and societies while recognizing that the meanings we derive from symbols hold greater significance for us than for the universe.
For instance, the Moon remains indifferent to the name we have assigned to it. Nevertheless, while naming does not alter the essence of the Moon, it empowers us. By designating the Moon as a destination, we eventually altered its status through our exploratory endeavors.
Section 1.2: The Role of Symbols in Human Progress
Our symbols enable us to comprehend and strategize on how to utilize our knowledge to achieve our aspirations. These goals are shaped by our vision of an ideal world. As civilization has progressed, we have sought to tame the wilderness, employing our minds and societies in the transformation of our environment.
Thus, while the term "Moon" may appear to merely refer to that celestial body orbiting Earth, this relationship is not philosophically neutral. The meaning we assign to symbols goes beyond mere agreement; it is a reflection of our active, creative engagement with an indifferent environment.
Our early ancestors named things during a time of animism, aiming to connect with nature's spirits or exert control through magic. Language has evolved alongside this pursuit, culminating in the more structured languages that emerged during the Scientific Revolution, leading to the Anthropocene.
The essence of a symbol is intertwined with its referent through standards or stereotypes that humanize the inhuman and celebrate our deceptive nature. Intentionality has always served as a tool in the struggle to dominate our surroundings. Through language, we externalize our thoughts, gaining leverage and inhabiting a meaningful space of collective awareness.
Ironically, just as the crystals in the geode may lose their allure once we understand their mineral origins, we come to realize that our rich internal experiences are rooted in a harsh, indifferent reality.
Chapter 2: The Grim Tidings of Philosophy
Civilization and human advancement have their roots in nature and our animal instincts. Despite our fervent desire to rebel against nature, we must acknowledge that the indifferent truths of existence will ultimately prevail. The contrast between our cherished meanings and the vast, impersonal, and often absurd external reality offers a sobering reminder of the philosophical journey we undertake.
The first video titled "How To Deconstruct The Illusion Of Self (w/Eshwar Segobind)" delves into the complexities surrounding our perception of self and the nature of reality. It provides insights into understanding the layers of self-deception and the pathways toward a clearer sense of identity.
The second video, "The Illusion of the Self: Why Fulfillment Isn't Found in the Next Achievement or Desire," examines the misleading notions of self-fulfillment through achievements. It challenges viewers to reconsider their pursuits and the deeper meanings behind their desires.