Chapter 1: Unpacking Foucault's Early Works

Michel Foucault's initial forays into psychology, particularly his 1957 essay "Psychology from 1850 to 1950" and his 1965 dialogue "Philosophy and Psychology" with Alain Badiou, provide a compelling insight into his evolving ideas. These texts not only critique psychology as a field but also lay the foundation for several concepts that would shape Foucault's intellectual journey. This article takes a brief look at these writings, uncovering their subtleties and ramifications.

Foucault's 1957 essay presents a detailed analysis of psychology's development over the past century. He begins with its 19th-century roots, when the discipline was enamored with the natural sciences — a phenomenon some psychoanalysts referred to as 'physics envy' — in its quest for empirical validation. He illustrates how early psychologists like Fechner, Wundt, and Ribot sought to apply the methodologies of physics and chemistry to the study of the mind. They aspired to identify mental "elements" similar to chemical compounds and to establish laws governing thought as precisely as Newton defined motion.

This pursuit of scientific credibility, according to Foucault, extended beyond mere academic ambition; it mirrored a broader cultural transformation in Western society's understanding of human nature. The Enlightenment had displaced God as the ultimate arbiter of truth regarding humanity, leaving science to fill that void with a new secular basis for self-awareness.

However, Foucault points out that this positivist perspective was riddled with contradictions from its inception. The human psyche was not easily quantifiable or amenable to universal laws. The more psychology attempted to mimic the natural sciences, the more it was confronted with the profound complexity of human experience. Aspects such as consciousness, emotion, and motivation proved to be far more elusive than atoms or chemical reactions.

Foucault's critique is both intricate and insightful. He does not simply dismiss early psychology as misguided; rather, he illustrates how the endeavor to render psychology scientific led to significant revelations regarding the limitations of scientific methods when applied to human subjectivity. This struggle to fit the intricate nature of human experience into the rigid framework of positivist science compelled psychology to grapple with fundamental inquiries concerning the essence of mind and meaning.

As Foucault traces the evolution of psychology, he highlights how the discipline adapted to these challenges by embracing new paradigms. The emergence of evolutionary theory provided a fresh lens through which to understand the mind. Thinkers such as Herbert Spencer and John Hughlings Jackson endeavored to conceptualize mental processes as products of biological and social evolution, suggesting a means to reconcile the intricacies of human psychology with the demand for scientific explanation.

Nevertheless, Foucault contends that while evolutionary psychology opened new paths for exploration, it ultimately fell short of delivering a holistic comprehension of the human mind. It continued to rely on a fundamentally naturalistic view that overlooked the influence of culture, meaning, and subjectivity in shaping psychological experiences.

The most significant turning point in Foucault's narrative occurs with the advent of Sigmund Freud and the practice of psychoanalysis. Both in the 1957 essay and the 1965 conversation, Foucault underscores the groundbreaking effect of Freud's contributions. He argues that psychoanalysis shifted the focus of psychology from causal explanations to the interpretation of meaning.

This transformation is pivotal. Prior to Freud, psychology largely concentrated on observable behaviors and quantifiable phenomena. Freud asserted that the most crucial elements of mental life lay hidden and unconscious, accessible only through meticulous interpretation. A slip of the tongue, a peculiar dream, or an irrational phobia — these were no longer trivialities or errors of rational thought; instead, they became texts rich with concealed significance.

Foucault's fascination with this interpretative pivot is evident. In the 1965 dialogue, he draws parallels between psychoanalysis and literary critique, suggesting that just as critics dissect a novel to reveal hidden meanings, psychoanalysts interpret the "text" of a patient's words and actions to uncover unconscious desires and conflicts.

Yet, Foucault extends this concept further, positing that the unconscious possesses a "language-like structure" that doesn't conform to conventional linguistic rules. He asserts that the unconscious "must convey not only what it says but the key to what it says." In this view, every mind becomes a mystery narrative where the detective and the perpetrator are one and the same, with clues concealed within the very narrative itself.

This emphasis on interpretation opened entirely new avenues for psychological inquiry, simultaneously raising profound questions about the nature of psychological knowledge. If psychology revolves around decoding meanings rather than unearthing facts, from where do those meanings arise? Foucault suggests that they are shaped by our history, culture, and social frameworks.

By the time of the 1965 dialogue, Foucault has refined this notion into a radical redefinition of psychology itself. He proposes that psychology should not be regarded as a science but rather as a "cultural form" — a way of thinking, speaking, and acting deeply rooted in Western intellectual and social history. This assertion provocatively extricates psychology from the laboratory, placing it firmly within the intricate and multifaceted realm of human culture.

Foucault further establishes connections between contemporary psychological practices and historical phenomena such as medieval confessionals and courtly love rituals. He contends that psychology, far from being an impartial, objective science, represents the latest evolution of long-standing Western practices of self-examination and transformation.

This reconceptualization allows Foucault to position psychology within a broader critique of Western thought. He introduces the concept of an "anthropological slumber" that has, since Kant, directed all of philosophy (and consequently, the human sciences) around the figure of "man" as both the subject and object of knowledge. In this light, psychology does not merely study human nature; it actively engages in the cultural construction of what it means to be human.

Foucault's analysis is both historical and philosophical, tracing the lineage of our modern concept of "man" and illustrating how it emerged at a specific moment in history, profoundly influencing our self-perception ever since. From this perspective, psychology does not uncover timeless truths about human nature but articulates and solidifies a historically contingent understanding of what it means to be human.

This insight leads to one of Foucault's most provocative assertions: psychological knowledge is intrinsically transformative. To know in the realm of psychology is also to enact change. This notion links psychology indelibly to issues of power and social control. If psychological knowledge shapes subjectivity, it raises critical questions about who possesses that knowledge and for what purposes.

Over the past century, psychology has forged new connections with various practical fields such as education, neurology, and organizational behavior. It has positioned itself as the rational and scientific foundation for these areas; for instance, developmental psychology has become the basis for educational methodologies, while psychopathology offers insights into psychiatric practices.

This relationship is reciprocal. Psychology has also integrated the issues presented by these fields as its own inquiries: concerns regarding academic success or failure, the challenge of reintegrating patients into society, and the need to adapt individuals to their professional roles. Through this ongoing dialogue and exchange of ideas, psychology has appeared to align itself with the natural sciences.

Nevertheless, Foucault emphasizes a crucial distinction. While the natural sciences address problems stemming from practical difficulties and temporary setbacks, psychology emerges at the intersection where human practices confront their own contradictions. For example, developmental psychology was born from reflections on developmental delays. Adaptation psychology arose from analyses of maladjustment phenomena. The psychology of memory, consciousness, and sensation initially appeared as the psychology of forgetting, the unconscious, and affective disorders.

This leads Foucault to a compelling assertion: contemporary psychology fundamentally analyzes the abnormal, the pathological, and the conflictual, reflecting on the contradictions inherent in human existence. It is only subsequently that it has evolved into a psychology of the normal, the adaptive, and the orderly, seemingly in an effort to master these contradictions.

Such insights dramatically reshape our understanding of psychology's role and essence. They suggest that psychology is not simply a neutral, objective science investigating the human mind but a discipline that has emerged from and continues to wrestle with the tensions and contradictions of human existence. This positions psychology as a field inherently connected to questions of normativity, power, and social regulation.

Moreover, this viewpoint challenges the prevalent narrative of psychological progress. Rather than perceiving psychology as gradually revealing the truths of human nature, Foucault invites us to view it as a shifting cultural practice, continually redefined by societal demands and contradictions. This perspective raises critical inquiries about psychology's role in shaping societal norms and individual subjectivities.

In this context, we can discern the seeds of many ideas that would occupy Foucault throughout his career: the historical contingency of knowledge, the intertwining of power and truth, and the mechanisms through which individuals become subjects. These early writings on psychology offer a glimpse into the thinker Foucault would later become, already challenging the boundaries of conventional academic discourse.

However, it is essential to recognize that Foucault is not outright dismissing psychology or negating its importance. Instead, he advocates for a more reflexive and critical approach to psychological knowledge. He urges us to consider not only what psychology understands but also how it arrives at that understanding and the effects of that knowledge on individuals and society.

Foucault's critical lens on psychology remains strikingly relevant in contemporary times. In an era dominated by cognitive neuroscience and big data analytics, his call to question foundational assumptions about human nature and the production of knowledge is more crucial than ever. His insistence on the cultural and historical dimensions of psychological knowledge serves as a valuable counter to reductive or biologistic approaches, reminding us that the human psyche cannot be separated from its social context.

Foucault's early writings on psychology mark a pivotal moment in the philosophy of the human sciences, offering not merely a critique of psychology but a foundational rethinking of human knowledge and existence. As we continue to navigate issues of mind, behavior, and society in the 21st century, Foucault's analysis serves as an essential tool for critical reflection, challenging us to think beyond established disciplines and consider the ethical and political implications of our self-understanding.

Ultimately, Foucault encourages us to view psychology not as a finalized science but as an ongoing cultural practice — a perpetual exploration of what it means to be human. In our fragmented and often alienating world, this perspective offers a valuable framework for continued inquiry and self-examination.

The first video titled "Mind Unbound: Liberating the Soul from Mental Clutter" offers insights into how to free oneself from psychological burdens and the significance of mental clarity.

The second video titled "Mind Unbound" delves into similar themes, exploring the liberation of the mind from constraints and the journey toward self-discovery.