Pandemic Conspiracy Theories: Examining the Claims and Evidence
Written on
The topic of the pandemic has sparked much debate, and many unresolved questions linger. I recently received a message via WhatsApp that piqued my curiosity, titled "Was the Pandemic Planned?" It led to a link discussing evidence that suggests the pandemic may have been orchestrated with intent.
The link outlines various claims, including the fact that the U.S. government contributed $3.7 million to the Wuhan Institute of Virology for coronavirus research, raising eyebrows about the origins of the virus.
Another intriguing reference is Dean Koontz's novel, "The Eyes of Darkness," which features a character discussing a biological weapon called "Wuhan-400," supposedly developed at a lab near Wuhan. Critics argue the original weapon in the 1981 edition was named "Gorki-400," and it was renamed in the 1989 reissue, as reported by the South China Morning Post.
The fundamental question remains: Did Koontz predict the pandemic more than twenty years ago? While the coronavirus indeed originated in Wuhan, both Chinese and Western authorities would likely deny any lab-related connection.
The theory that the virus emerged from bats and wet markets lacks credibility, as these markets have existed for centuries, long before the pandemic. Eating bats does not logically explain how a virus spreads through the air. Evolution does not occur whimsically, but rather out of necessity.
Selective Genocide
I contend that diseases like HIV, Ebola, SARS, MERS, and now COVID-19 might be part of a deliberate strategy to control or even reduce the population, particularly targeting those with pre-existing health conditions and the elderly.
If these viruses were engineered for warfare, they would be indiscriminate in their lethality, affecting a broader demographic rather than selectively targeting the v