NASA's SABERS Battery: A Game Changer for Electric Aviation
Written on
Understanding NASA's Ambitions
While it may seem that NASA and Tesla operate in completely different arenas—one focused on electric vehicles (EVs) and the other on space exploration—the two are more interconnected than you might think. NASA is actively working to revolutionize the aviation industry by developing zero-emissions aircraft. This has led to the creation of advanced battery technology through their SABERS program, which has recently made waves by introducing a battery that outperforms Tesla's own innovations. The question arises: should Elon Musk be concerned? How has NASA achieved this remarkable feat?
Before we delve deeper, it’s essential to grasp the motivations behind NASA’s battery development and the crucial benchmarks they aim to meet.
Aerodynamics and Energy Needs
Aircraft, unlike cars, are extremely sensitive to weight. Any excess weight not only reduces efficiency but can also hinder flight capabilities. An electric car can accommodate a large battery pack to achieve impressive driving ranges without significant drawbacks. In contrast, using current battery technology in an airplane could lead to such excessive weight that it would struggle to fly or transport passengers effectively. Thus, for NASA to create batteries suitable for aviation, they must possess significantly higher energy density than those currently available.
Safety is another paramount concern. Lithium-ion batteries, prevalent in EVs, are known for their propensity to ignite and are notoriously difficult to extinguish. While this poses a manageable risk in vehicles, the stakes are drastically higher at cruising altitudes.
NASA's Solution: A Revolutionary Battery
NASA recently announced a groundbreaking battery pack boasting an extraordinary 500 Wh/kg energy density. For context, Tesla's 4680 battery peaks at around 296 Wh/kg, while typical EV batteries hover around 250 Wh/kg. Additionally, NASA’s battery has enhanced safety features, capable of withstanding temperatures twice that of conventional lithium-ion batteries.
This places NASA at the forefront of battery technology. For instance, ONE has developed an energy-dense battery with 1007 Wh/kg, but its LiMnO³ chemistry comes with a significant fire risk. So, what were NASA’s secrets?
Innovative Design Approach
NASA approached battery design differently. Tesla’s 4680 battery utilizes a common cylindrical format, where the electrodes and electrolyte are layered and rolled into a cylinder—akin to traditional AA and AAA batteries. This method makes them durable and fairly energy-efficient. In contrast, NASA produces large sheets of electrodes and electrolytes, stacking multiple sheets together before encasing them as a single unit. This approach minimizes packaging materials and enhances inter-cell efficiency, resulting in a weight reduction of up to 40% and doubling energy density.
However, utilizing standard lithium-ion chemistry posed challenges. If a battery were to fail, there would be no space for expansion, presenting significant explosion risks. Additionally, the reduced surface area complicates cooling, an essential requirement for lithium-ion batteries.
To address these issues, NASA opted for solid-state battery chemistry. This type retains lithium for charge storage but employs a solid electrolyte instead of a liquid one. Solid electrolytes are much less flammable, making solid-state batteries significantly safer. Furthermore, NASA's design can withstand temperatures twice as high as traditional lithium-ion batteries, reducing cooling needs and the likelihood of catastrophic failures.
The Future of Electric Aviation
The SABERS program has successfully developed a battery that is not only highly energy-dense but also exceptionally safe, paving the way for practical electric aviation. However, the implications of this battery extend beyond aviation.
Tesla's 4680 battery was engineered for enhanced energy density and cost efficiency, particularly through its large cell size that reduces the number of required cells, leading to a 33% decrease in battery pack costs. The SABERS design could potentially lower manufacturing costs even more, as it might allow for the construction of a single cell capable of serving the entire pack. Enhanced energy density and safety could elevate vehicle performance to industry-leading levels, making it one of the safest EVs available.
Is Tesla at Risk?
Despite the impressive capabilities of the SABERS battery, there are reasons for skepticism regarding its immediate threat to Tesla. Solid-state batteries are complex to produce at scale, making them prohibitively expensive for widespread use in the short term. It may take a decade or more before solid-state technology becomes affordable and commonplace. Moreover, even if available, NASA's unique packing method may not translate well to the automotive sector.
For instance, Tesla’s older 2170 cell operates at 3.7 volts with a maximum of 6,000 mA, and a standard pack includes 4,416 cells. If these were wired in series like NASA's battery, it would yield an impractical pack voltage of over 16,000 volts with a meager amperage. Tesla’s design effectively balances voltage and amperage to power electric motors efficiently.
Thus, for NASA to adapt the SABERS battery for practical use, it would still require multiple units connected in parallel to create a functional pack. While SABERS batteries may offer higher energy density than Tesla's 4680, the cost implications for manufacturing could be comparable.
In conclusion, while NASA's SABERS battery outshines Tesla's technology in energy density and safety, the challenges of scalability and application in the EV market suggest that Tesla's position remains secure for the time being. Nevertheless, it’s likely that competitors will explore the revolutionary advancements offered by SABERS for their future battery developments.
Explore why NASA is investing in solid-state battery technology and its potential impact on energy storage and electric vehicles.
Dive into NASA's eclipse presentation and discover how their advancements in battery technology could shape the future of aviation.